Challenges in the regulation of occupational risk management in Brazil

Anastácio Pinto Gonçalves Filho

ORCID iD Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA), Salvador, Bahia, Brasil

Diego Pinto de Barros Leal

ORCID iD Ministério do Trabalho e Emprego (MTE), Salvador, Bahia, Brasil

Resumo

Occupational accidents and illnesses pose a serious public health issue in Brazil. Recognizing this, Brazilian government authorities have acknowledged the need to implement measures to improve environmental work conditions, and equipment control, and promote occupational safety and health. The complexity of workplace health and safety in Brazil is partly due to the country's diverse range of companies, which vary in technological levels, sizes, motivations, resources, and competencies, with the majority being micro and small enterprises (MSEs). This study aims to investigate whether the strategy adopted by Brazil since 2022 to regulate occupational risk management and promote occupational health and safety has been complied with by companies. To achieve this, all notices of violation related to occupational risk management were analyzed from January 2022 to June 2023. In total, 5,547 cases of violations were examined. In total, 5,547 cases of violations were examined. It was concluded that the occupational risk management regulation strategy alone is insufficient, as many companies have not implemented these measures. There is a need to improve labor inspection services. Safety and health regulatory bodies should be strengthened to consistently and thoroughly conduct workplace inspections and ensure compliance with regulations. Additionally, increasing fines for non-compliance with occupational safety and health regulations is imperative. Public policies and interventions encouraging MSEs to adhere to occupational risk management and invest in workplace improvements are essential.

Palavras-chave


occupational accident; occupational risk; regulation; risk management


Referências


ASHBY, S. G.; DIACON, S. R. Motives for occupational risk management in large UK companies. Safety Science, v. 22, n. 1-3, p. 229-243, 1996. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0925-7535(96)00017-3.

BLANC, F.; PEREIRA, M. M. E. Risks, circumstances and regulation: historical development, diversity of structures and practices in Occupational Safety and Health inspections. Safety Science, v. 130, 104850, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104850.

BRAZIL. Secretariat of Labour and Inspection. Statistics and Information Dashboard of Labor Inspection in Brazil, 2022. Available at: https://sit.trabalho.gov.br/radar/. Accessed on: 19 May 2023. In Portuguese.

Brazil. Ministry of Labour and Employment. Regulatory Noms – RN. 2023. Available at: https://www.gov.br/trabalho-e-emprego/pt-br/assuntos/inspecao-do-trabalho/seguranca-e-saude-no-trabalho/ctpp-nrs/normas-regulamentadoras-nrs. Accessed on: 06 June 2024. In Portuguese.

BRAZIL. Ministry of Labour and Employment. Regulatory Norm No. 1 (RN 1). 2024a. Available at: https://www.gov.br/trabalho-e-emprego/pt-br/acesso-a-informacao/participacao-social/conselhos-e-orgaos-colegiados/comissao-tripartite-partitaria-permanente/normas-regulamentadora/normas-regulamentadoras-vigentes/nr-1. Accessed on: 30 May 2024. In Portuguese.

BRAZIL. Ministry of Labour and Employment. Regulatory Norm No. 1 (RN 1). 2024b. Available at: https://www.gov.br/trabalho-e-emprego/pt-br/acesso-a-informacao/participacao-social/conselhos-e-orgaos-colegiados/comissao-tripartite-partitaria-permanente/normas-regulamentadora/normas-regulamentadoras-vigentes/nr-01-atualizada-2024.pdf. Accessed on: 30 may 2024. In Portuguese.

CARDOSO, A.; LAGE, T. Labor inspection in Brazil. Revista de Ciências Sociais, v. 48, n. 3, p. 451-490, 2005. Available at: http://socialsciences.scielo.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0011-52582006000200004. Accessed on: 30 may 2024.

EUROSTAT – EUROPEAN STATISTICS. European statistics on accidents at work (ESAW). Summary methodology, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2785/40882.

EASHW – EUROPEAN AGENCY FOR SAFETY AND HEALTH AT WORK. Risk assessment tool. Numberg: EASHW, 2024 2007. Available at: https://osha.europa.eu/en/publications/risk-assessment-tool. Accessed on: 30 may 2024.

FEITOSA, C. O.; CARVALHO, L. A. A desconstrução das garantias em segurança e saúde do trabalho com a Reforma Trabalhista de 2017. Laborare, v.5, n. 8, p. 6-29, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33637/2595-847x.2022-128. In Portuguese.

GUASCH, J. L.; HAHN, R. W. The costs and benefits of regulation: implications for developing countries. The World Bank Research Observer, v. 14, n. 1, p. 137-158, 1999. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/14.1.137.

HALE, A.; BORYS, D.; ADAMS, M. Safety regulation: the lessons of workplace safety rule management for managing the regulatory burden. Safety Science, v. 71, Part B, p. 112-122, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2013.11.012.

ILO – INTERNATIONAL LABOUR ORGANISATION. Statistic on safety and health at work, 2024. Available at: https://ilostat.ilo.org/topics/safety-and-health-at-work/. Accessed on: 30 may 2024.

JACINTO, C.; GUEDES SOARES, C.; FIALHO, T.; SILVA, S. A. RIATT: Registro, investigação e análise de acidente de trabalho. Manual do usuário. Revision 1.1, 2010. Available at: http://www.mar.ist.utl.pt/captar/images/Manual%20do%20utilizador_RIAAT_revis%C3%A3o%201.1_Maio%202010.pdf. Accessed on: 01 Jun 2024. In Portuguese.

JENSEN, P. L.; ALSTRUP, L.; THOFT, E. Workplace assessment: a tool for occupational health and safety management in small firms?. Applied Ergonomics, v. 32, n. 5, p. 433-440, 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-6870(01)00037-0.

LEVINE, D. L.; TOFFEL, M. W.; JOHNSON, M. S. Randomized government safety inspections reduce worker injuries with no detectable job loss. Science, v. 336, n. 6083, p. 907-911, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1215191.

NCUBE, F.; KANDA, A. Current status and the future of occupational safety and health legislation in low- and middle-income countries. Safety and Health at Work, v. 9, n. 4, p. 365-371, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2018.01.007.

NICHOLS, T. The sociology of industrial injury. London: Mansell, 1997.

NISKANEN, T. The effects of the enforcement legislation in the Finnish occupational safety and health inspectorate. Safety Science, v. 55, p. 135-148, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2013.01.002.

PICOLOTTO, E.; LAZARETTI, M.; TRINDADE, E. As reformas neoliberais no Brasil e os seus impactos na ação syndical e na precarização do trabalho rural. Laborare, v. 5, n. 9, p. 9-33, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33637/2595-847x.2022-130. In Portuguese.

RIKHOTSO, O.; MORODI, T. J.; MASEKAMENI, D. M. Health risk management cost items imposed by occupational health and safety regulations: a South African perspective. Safety Science, v. 150, 105707, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2022.105707.

RODRIGUES, M. A.; SÁ, A.; MASI, D.; OLIVEIRA, A.; BOUSTRAS, G.; LEKA, S.; GULDENMUND, F. Occupational Health & Safety (OHS) management practices in micro- and small-sized enterprises: the case of the Portuguese waste management sector. Safety Science, v. 129, 104794, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104794.

SALGUERO-CAPARRÓS, F.; PARDO-FERREIRA, M. C.; MARTÍNEZ-ROJAS, M.; RUBIO-ROMERO, J. C. Management of legal compliance in occupational health and safety: a literature review. Safety Science, v. 121, p. 111-118, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2019.08.033.

SEBRAE – SERVIÇO BRASILEIRO DE APOIO ÀS MICRO E PEQUENAS EMPRESAS. Micro e pequenas empresas geram 27% do PIB no Brasil. 202?. Available at: https://sebrae.com.br/sites/PortalSebrae/ufs/mt/noticias/micro-e-pequenas-empresas-geram-27-do-pib-do-brasil,ad0fc70646467410VgnVCM2000003c74010aRCRD. Accessed on: 30 may 2024. In Portuguese.

SINAIT – SINDICATO NACIONAL DOS AUDITORES FISCAIS DO TRABALHO. Concurso público – reforço para fiscalização é destaque na fala do presidente do SINAIT para o Metrópoles, 2023. Available at: https://www.sinait.org.br/noticia/20838/concurso-publicoreforco-para-a-fiscalizacao-e-destaque-na-fala-do-presidente-do-sinait-para-o-metropoles. Accessed on: 30 may 2024. In Portuguese.

SMARTLAB. Iniciativa Smartlab. Promoção do trabalho decente guiado por dados, 2024. Available at: https://smartlabbr.org/sst. Accessed on: 30 may 2024. In Portuguese.

TAKALA, J.; HÄMÄLÄINEN, P.; SAARELA, K. L.; YUN, L. Y.; MANICKAM, K.; JIN, T. W.; HENG, P.; TJONG, C.; KHENG, L. G.; LIM, S.; LIN, G. S. Global estimates of the burden of injury and illness at work in 2012. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene, v. 11, n. 5, p. 326-337, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15459624.2013.863131.

VELOSO, G. N. S. Trabalhadores no governo ditatorial: legislações em saúde, higiene e segurança do trabalho (1970-1980). 2017. Dissertação (Mestrado em Trabalho, Saúde e Ambiente) – Fundacentro, São Paulo, 2017. Available at: https://sucupira.capes.gov.br/sucupira/public/consultas/coleta/trabalhoConclusao/viewTrabalhoConclusao.jsf?popup=true&id_trabalho=6252634. Accessed on: 30 may 2024. In Portuguese.

WRIGHT, M. Factors motivating proactive health and safety management. HSE Contract Research Report 179/1998. Sudbury: HSE Books, 1998.


DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18265/2447-9187a2024id8369